BLACK mobile logo

detroit

politics

Fact check: Would ‘money out of politics’ proposal stifle free speech?

August 20, 2026

Michigan voters may decide in November whether to restrict political contributions from executives and major stakeholders at regulated utilities like DTE Energy and Consumers Energy, as well as large government contractors. The proposal, approved for the ballot by the Board of State Canvassers, would ban donations to candidates, PACs, and political parties by company leaders, board members, significant owners, and their immediate families. Supporters argue the measure would reduce corruption and pay-to-play politics, while opponents claim it violates First Amendment free speech rights and may not survive legal challenges.

Who is affected

  • Michigan voters
  • DTE Energy and Consumers Energy (regulated utilities)
  • Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
  • Government contractors with over $250,000 annually in contracts
  • CEOs, presidents, treasurers, officers, board members, and people with substantial ownership of affected companies
  • Immediate family members of the above individuals
  • Political candidates and lawmakers in both major political parties
  • Political action committees (PACs) and political parties
  • Ballot committees and issue advocacy organizations
  • Michiganders for Money Out of Politics (Mop Up Michigan) - the ballot committee
  • Protect MI Free Speech - the opposition group

What action is being taken

  • The Board of State Canvassers has approved a ballot summary for the proposal
  • Opponents have asked the Michigan Supreme Court to block the proposal from appearing on the ballot

Why it matters

  • This proposal represents a significant test of how far states can regulate political contributions without violating First Amendment protections established in cases like Citizens United. The measure targets a specific corruption concern—the influence of regulated monopolies and government contractors on politicians who oversee their business—which courts have historically viewed more favorably than broad campaign finance restrictions. If passed, it could substantially limit political influence by major utilities that have spent significant sums supporting candidates from both parties, potentially reshaping Michigan's political landscape and serving as a model for similar efforts in other states.

What's next

  • The proposal is slated for the November 3 ballot
  • The Michigan Legislature could enact the proposal before the election
  • The Michigan Supreme Court will rule on opponents' request to block the ballot measure
  • If the measure passes, it could prompt a lawsuit challenging its constitutionality

Read full article from source: bridgedetroit.com