BLACK mobile logo

international

Do you follow?: How technology can exacerbate ‘information disorder’ 

November 10, 2025

Social media platforms have become crucial spaces for marginalized communities, particularly LGBTQ+ youth seeking connection and support, though they simultaneously expose users to harmful misinformation and hate speech. Meta's January 2025 decision to eliminate third-party fact-checking in favor of community notes, along with removing LGBTQ+ protections, has alarmed human rights groups and journalists who point to platform algorithms' role in spreading false information and fueling real-world violence. These algorithms prioritize engagement over accuracy, leading users down radicalization pathways and making misinformation difficult to correct once it spreads.

Who is affected

  • LGBTQ+ youth and trans community members
  • Rohingya people in Myanmar (genocide victims)
  • Communities experiencing ethnic violence in Kenya, Ethiopia, and Nigeria
  • Journalists and human rights organizations
  • Teenagers and young adults who use social media as primary news sources
  • German voters exposed to right-wing content ahead of 2025 elections
  • Indonesian voters influenced by AI avatars during 2024 elections
  • Venezuelan journalists facing imprisonment threats
  • Young viewers on YouTube Kids exposed to eating disorder content
  • General social media users vulnerable to scams and data breaches

What action is being taken

  • Meta is ending their third-party fact-checking program and removing policies that protect LGBTQ+ users. Journalists in Venezuela are utilizing digital avatars to protect their identities while reporting. Researchers are conducting ongoing studies examining platform algorithms, misinformation spread, and radicalization pathways across social media platforms.

Why it matters

  • The decision matters because algorithms that prioritize engagement over accuracy have been implicated in real-world violence, including genocide and ethnic conflict, with research showing that a small number of habitual users can disproportionately impact information ecosystems. Social media has become the primary news source for younger generations, yet platforms continue to amplify misinformation that is nearly impossible to correct once it spreads, leading to erosion of trust in factual information and potentially giving governments greater control over information flows. The asymmetrical nature of technology means that while it can empower marginalized communities and protect vulnerable journalists, the same tools simultaneously enable oppression, radicalization, and harm at a scale that threatens democratic discourse and human rights.

What's next

  • No explicit next steps stated in the article

Read full article from source: Global Voices