BLACK mobile logo

international

Pride and prejudice in Jamaica

June 12, 2025

During Pride Month in Jamaica, LGBTQ+ communities celebrate while still facing persistent homophobia, exemplified by Science Minister Daryl Vaz's recent endorsement of an anti-gay song at a political rally. Human rights groups, including Equality for All Foundation (formerly J-FLAG), have demanded an apology for this action, which occurred as Jamaica approaches a constitutionally mandated general election. This incident continues a pattern of anti-gay rhetoric in Jamaican politics, despite previous commitments from both major parties to avoid homophobia during campaigns and some progress in condemning discrimination.

Who is affected

  • LGBTQ+ communities in Jamaica
  • Human rights advocacy groups including Equality for All Foundation (EFAF)
  • Jamaican citizens exposed to homophobic rhetoric during political campaigns
  • LGBTQ+ activist Maurice Tomlinson who challenged the buggery law
  • Vulnerable communities targeted by discriminatory language and policies

What action is being taken

  • Human rights groups are demanding an apology from Minister Daryl Vaz for endorsing an anti-gay song
  • The Jamaica Council of Churches is condemning political figures for actions contributing to divisiveness
  • Advocacy groups are continuing to argue for decriminalization of the buggery law
  • Politicians are using anti-gay rhetoric during the current "silly season" election campaign
  • EFAF is calling for stronger guidelines regarding appropriate conduct on the campaign trail

Why it matters

  • The use of homophobic rhetoric by government officials contributes to discrimination and violence against LGBTQ+ people
  • Jamaica's buggery law continues to criminalize same-sex intimacy despite international pressure
  • Political endorsement of anti-gay sentiments undermines progress toward equality and inclusivity
  • The upcoming general election presents both risks of increased homophobia and opportunities for policy change
  • Jamaica's non-compliance with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights ruling demonstrates resistance to LGBTQ+ rights reforms

What's next

  • No explicit next steps stated in the article

Read full article from source: Global Voices