BLACK mobile logo

international

‘Silence has become both more dangerous and more complicit’: An interview with Lebanese-British artist, Amale Khlat

August 13, 2026

Lebanese-British artist Amale Freiha Khlat creates contemplative, multilayered installations that engage with war, displacement, and memory without reproducing graphic images of suffering. Trained at institutions in Paris and London, she employs diverse media including sculpture, print, video, and theatrical staging to construct spaces where viewers must grapple with ethical complexities rather than consume easily digestible emotional responses. Her approach relies on concealment, reflection, and material presence—using elements like screens, mirrors, empty chairs, and sealed archival boxes—to make audiences aware of their own complicity as spectators.

Who is affected

  • Gallery visitors and art audiences who engage with Khlat's installations
  • Lebanese-British artist Amale Freiha Khlat herself, shaped by childhood experiences of the Lebanese civil war
  • War victims, refugees, and displaced persons whose experiences are represented indirectly through her work
  • Museums, galleries, and cultural institutions that display or collect her work
  • Arms manufacturers and corporate sponsors referenced in her critique of institutional complicity
  • Collectors and the broader art world that responds to politically charged contemporary art

What action is being taken

  • Khlat is creating multidisciplinary installations that use concealment, reflection, and material presence to address war, displacement, and memory. She is exhibiting works like "The Archive of Silence" (2025) at The Handbag Factory Gallery in London and "The Celestial Weave" (2025) at the same venue. She is producing work across various media including sculpture, print, video, sound, and artist books that refuse to provide easy emotional release to viewers.

Why it matters

  • Khlat's work addresses a critical challenge of our image-saturated age: how to engage meaningfully with war and suffering when constant exposure to images creates emotional fatigue and indifference rather than understanding or action. Her approach matters because it transforms passive spectators into active participants who must confront their own complicity, choices about what to see, and relationship to institutional power structures that determine which stories get told. By refusing the quick emotional release of direct imagery, her installations create sustained engagement with ethical questions about memory, erasure, and responsibility. Her work also interrogates how museums and cultural institutions are complicit in shaping narratives through sponsorship relationships and curatorial decisions about what deserves archiving and display.

What's next

  • No explicit next steps stated in the article

Read full article from source: Global Voices