BLACK mobile logo

california

community

Kevin Epps: ‘Felon With a Gun’ or Community Asset?

December 11, 2025

Kevin Epps, a 57-year-old documentary filmmaker, is standing trial for the 2016 fatal shooting of Marcus Polk, with community supporters rallying outside the San Francisco courthouse to protest what they call selective prosecution. The case, which was initially dropped but reopened in 2019, relies heavily on circumstantial evidence and testimony from Polk's estranged wife, whose credibility has been questioned due to inconsistent statements. The trial has reached the jury instruction phase after three weeks of testimony, with prosecutors arguing premeditated murder while the defense claims self-defense under California's Castle Doctrine, asserting that Epps acted to protect himself when Polk unlawfully entered the home where Epps was living.

Who is affected

  • Kevin Epps (57-year-old documentary filmmaker facing murder charges)
  • Epps' mother Brenda (octogenarian attending trial proceedings)
  • Marcus Polk (49-year-old deceased victim)
  • Starr Gul (Polk's estranged wife and sole eyewitness)
  • Gul's two daughters (testified during trial)
  • Epps' supporters including faith leaders, community advocates, and the San Francisco NAACP chapter
  • Maryam Jahn (Epps' common-law wife)
  • Maintenance workers (who had a confrontation with Polk before the incident)

What action is being taken

  • The trial is in the jury instructions phase
  • Jury instruction hearings are being conducted
  • Epps' supporters are holding rallies on courthouse steps, attending court daily, issuing press releases, and displaying signs
  • The San Francisco D.A.'s office is prosecuting the case
  • Defense and prosecution attorneys are arguing over which legal doctrines and instructions should apply to the jury
  • The judge is ruling on what evidence and legal theories the jury can consider

Why it matters

  • This case raises significant questions about prosecutorial discretion, racial justice, and self-defense rights. Community activists view the prosecution as selective and question why the case was reopened years after being dropped without substantial new evidence, suggesting potential double standards and racial implications in the justice system. The outcome will determine whether Epps faces life imprisonment and sets a precedent for how California's Castle Doctrine and self-defense laws apply when felons claim they acted in self-defense. The case also highlights tensions between prosecutorial authority and community perceptions of fair justice, particularly within African American communities concerned about equitable treatment in the criminal justice system.

What's next

  • Closing arguments will be presented, with the prosecution arguing deliberate murder and the defense arguing provocation and self-defense
  • The jury will receive instructions and begin deliberations to determine Epps' fate

Read full article from source: The San Diego Voice & Viewpoint