BLACK mobile logo

california

politics

What Trump’s Control of D.C. Police Means for the City, Its Mayor, and Black Residents

August 11, 2025

President Donald Trump has taken control of Washington D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department from Mayor Muriel Bowser by invoking Section 740 of the D.C. Home Rule Act under a "crime emergency" declaration. This unprecedented action places the police force under Attorney General Tom Cotton's command, allowing federal authorities to redirect officers from neighborhood patrols to federal buildings, monuments, and protests. Trump cited 2024 homicide and vehicle theft rates to justify the takeover, despite crime reductions in other cities with large Black populations that he has criticized.

Who is affected

  • Washington D.C. residents, particularly African Americans who comprise nearly half the city's population
  • Mayor Muriel Bowser, who has lost operational control of her police department
  • D.C. Metropolitan Police Department officers, now under federal command
  • Local communities that may experience reduced neighborhood policing
  • Protesters and demonstrators in D.C. who may face increased policing

What action is being taken

  • President Trump is exercising direct control over D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department through a "crime emergency" declaration
  • The Justice Department is assuming operational command of police deployment decisions
  • Federal authorities are redirecting D.C. police resources from local communities to federal priorities
  • The Trump administration is implementing this takeover without setting an end date

Why it matters

  • The federal takeover removes local democratic control over policing in the nation's capital
  • This action disproportionately impacts Black communities in a city with a large African American population
  • The move highlights D.C.'s lack of statehood and its residents' vulnerability to federal intervention
  • Trump's focus on D.C. appears selective when compared to crime reductions in other cities he has criticized
  • The indefinite nature of the order creates uncertainty about when local control might be restored

What's next

  • No explicit next steps stated in the article

Read full article from source: The San Diego Voice & Viewpoint